Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 55
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465911

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People who live with HIV (PWLH) have been one of the most affected groups during the current mpox outbreak. They are hypothesized to have a more severe clinical course than people without HIV but comparative data is scarce. We aimed to compare clinical features and outcomes of mpox in people with and without HIV in Mexico. SETTING: Country-wide study in Mexico. METHODS: We performed an observational study using nation-wide epidemiological data. We included all people with confirmed mpox diagnosed between May and November 2022 in Mexico. Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were compared between people with and without HIV. Multivariable logistic regression models were preformed to determine the association between HIV, clinical features, and outcomes and reported with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). ORs for rare outcomes were interpreted as risk ratios. RESULTS: Among 3291 people with mpox, 59% were PWLH. PWLH had an increased risk of severe mpox (OR 2.6, 2.4-2.9) and death (OR 10.8, 9.7-11.9). They also had a higher risk of otalgia, proctitis, and urethritis. Eleven individuals died, of whom ten were PWLH. All deaths were directly attributed to mpox. CONCLUSION: People with HIV have a higher risk of severe mpox and death due to mpox.

2.
Heliyon ; 10(1): e23629, 2024 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38192840

RESUMEN

Background: Pediatric COVID-19 patients have lower rates of hospitalization and fatal outcomes compared to adults with COVID-19; however, children represent a challenge in the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of COVID-19. Our aim was to determine the risk factors for hospital admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, and mortality in pediatric COVID-19 patients in Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: A retrospective cohort of pediatric patients with COVID-19 from February 2020 to April 2021 was reported on the National Epidemiological Surveillance System for Viral Respiratory Disease (SISVER) platform. Results: Among the 104,133 patients included in our study, 6214 were hospitalized, and 621 patients underwent invasive mechanical ventilation. A total of 0.65 % died during hospitalization. Children aged <12 months (odds ratio [OR]: 17.1; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 15.9-19.4, p < 0.001), 1-4 years (OR: 3.69; 95 % CI: 3.2-4.1, p < 0.001), 5-9 years (OR: 1.86; 95 % CI: 1.66-2.08, p < 0.001), and 10-14 years (OR: 1.23; 95 % CI: 1.11-1.37, p < 0.001), and those diagnosed with diabetes (OR: 2.32; 95 % CI 1.68-3.20, p < 0.001) and obesity (OR: 1.24; 95 % CI 1.04-1.48, p = 0.015) were associated with hospital admission. Renal disease (OR: 3.85; 95 % CI: 2.25-6.59, p < 0.001) was associated with invasive mechanical ventilation. Pneumonia (OR: 15.9; 95 % CI: 12.6-20.1, p < 0.001) and renal disease (OR: 3.85; 95 % CI: 2.25-6.59, p value < 0.001) were associated with death. Conclusion: Pneumonia increases the risk of death. The youngest age group has a higher risk of hospital admission. Comorbidities such as renal disease or immunosuppression increase the risk of death in all age groups.

3.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1146059, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37081954

RESUMEN

Background: With the widespread transmission of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant, reinfections have become increasingly common. Here, we explored the role of immunity, primary infection severity, and variant predominance in the risk of reinfection and severe COVID-19 during Omicron predominance in Mexico. Methods: We analyzed reinfections in Mexico in individuals with a primary infection separated by at least 90 days from reinfection using a national surveillance registry of SARS-CoV-2 cases from March 3rd, 2020, to August 13th, 2022. Immunity-generating events included primary infection, partial or complete vaccination, and booster vaccines. Reinfections were matched by age and sex with controls with primary SARS-CoV-2 infection and negative RT-PCR or antigen test at least 90 days after primary infection to explore reinfection and severe disease risk factors. We also compared the protective efficacy of heterologous and homologous vaccine boosters against reinfection. Results: We detected 231,202 SARS-CoV-2 reinfections in Mexico, most occurring in unvaccinated individuals (41.55%). Over 207,623 reinfections occurred during periods of Omicron (89.8%), BA.1 (36.74%), and BA.5 (33.67%) subvariant predominance and a case-fatality rate of 0.22%. Vaccination protected against reinfection, without significant influence of the order of immunity-generating events and provided >90% protection against severe reinfections. Heterologous booster schedules were associated with ~11% and ~ 54% lower risk for reinfection and reinfection-associated severe COVID-19, respectively, modified by time-elapsed since the last immunity-generating event, when compared against complete primary schedules. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 reinfections increased during Omicron predominance. Hybrid immunity provides protection against reinfection and associated severe COVID-19, with potential benefit from heterologous booster schedules.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Reinfección/epidemiología , México/epidemiología , Inmunidad Adaptativa
4.
Int J Infect Dis ; 129: 188-196, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36775188

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Vaccination has been effective in ameliorating the impact of COVID-19. Here, we report vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the nationally available COVID-19 vaccines in Mexico. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a COVID-19 surveillance system to assess the VE of the BNT162b2, messenger RNA (mRNA)-12732, Gam-COVID-Vac, Ad5-nCoV, Ad26.COV2.S, ChAdOx1, and CoronaVac vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 hospitalization, and death in Mexico. The VE was estimated using time-varying Cox proportional hazard models in vaccinated and unvaccinated adults, adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. VE was also estimated for adults with diabetes, aged ≥60 years, and comparing the predominance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.519 and B.1.617.2. RESULTS: We assessed 793,487 vaccinated and 4,792,338 unvaccinated adults between December 24, 2020 and September 27, 2021. The VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection was the highest for fully vaccinated individuals with mRNA-12732 (91.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 90.3-92.4) and Ad26.COV2.S (82.2%, 95% CI 81.4-82.9); for COVID-19 hospitalization, BNT162b2 (84.3%, 95% CI 83.6-84.9) and Gam-COVID-Vac (81.4% 95% CI 79.5-83.1), and for mortality, BNT162b2 (89.8%, 95% CI 89.2-90.2) and mRNA-12732 (93.5%, 95% CI 86.0-97.0). The VE decreased for all vaccines in adults aged ≥60 years, people with diabetes, and periods of Delta variant predominance. CONCLUSION: All the vaccines implemented in Mexico were effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 hospitalization, and death. Mass vaccination with multiple vaccines is useful to maximize vaccination coverage.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Vacuna BNT162 , Ad26COVS1 , México/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Hospitalización , ARN Mensajero
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 151(3): 402e-411e, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36399662

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abdominal obesity has been associated with an increased risk of insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes. Central fat removal procedures such as liposuction, lipectomy, and abdominoplasty are among the most common surgical procedures. The impact of the latter on the former is controversial and understudied. The authors aimed to explore the effect of subcutaneous fat elimination procedures on insulin resistance measures and adipokine levels. METHODS: Relevant studies regarding the effects of surgical subcutaneous fat removal on glucose, insulin, adipokines, and lipid metabolism, as well as blood pressure, were identified by searching PubMed and Ovid-Cochrane without limits in date, type of publication, or language. After the selection process, 24 studies were obtained. The results of the articles were summarized using descriptive statistics. For the final analysis, a randomized effects model was used to evaluate heterogeneity; averages and meta-analytic differences were expressed with a confidence interval of 95%. RESULTS: All studies reported a reduction in weight (-2.64 kg; 95% CI, -4.32 to -0.96; P = 0.002; I 2 = 36%; P of I 2 < 0.001) and body mass index after liposuction. A significant improvement in triglycerides (-10.06 mg/dL; 95% CI, -14.03 to -6.09; P < 0.001; I 2 = 48%; P of I 2 = 0.05), serum glucose concentration (-4.25 mg/dL; 95% CI, -5.93 to -2.56; P < 0.001; I 2 = 68%; P of I 2 < 0.001), serum insulin concentration (-2.86 µIU/mL; 95% CI, -3.75 to -1.97; P < 0.001; I 2 = 59%; P of I 2 = 0.003), and serum leptin concentration (-7.70 ng/mL; 95% CI, -11.49 to -3.92; P = 0.0001; I 2 = 96%; P of I 2 < 0.001) was consistently observed. CONCLUSION: In addition to weight loss, there is a significant decrease in leptin, triglyceride, glucose, and insulin serum concentrations after liposuction, a fact that should be considered in future discussions.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a la Insulina , Lipectomía , Humanos , Lipectomía/métodos , Insulina , Leptina , Resistencia a la Insulina/fisiología , Glucosa , Obesidad/cirugía , Índice de Masa Corporal , Glucemia , Lípidos , Peso Corporal
6.
Lancet Reg Health Am ; 17: 100392, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36405887

RESUMEN

Background: Human monkeypox, a zoonosis historically endemic to West and South Africa, has led to a worldwide outbreak driven by human-to-human transmission resulting in an international public health emergency. Endemic and outbreak monkeypox cases may differ in their affected populations, clinical features, and outcomes. Thus, profiling cases of the current monkeypox outbreak worldwide is crucial. Methods: We performed a nationwide observational surveillance-based study from May 24 to September 5, 2022. Patients that met the operational clinical definition of monkeypox or symptomatic close contacts of confirmed cases were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Clinical data were collected with a standardized case-report form. We report epidemiologic, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics of confirmed cases. Findings: Five-hundred and sixty-five human monkeypox confirmed cases were analysed; 97.2% were men, of whom 59.5% identified as men who have sex with men, and 54.5% had human immunodeficiency virus infection. The median age was 34 years. All patients but one had rash (99.8%), 78.9% had fever, and 47.8% reported myalgia. The anogenital area was the most commonly affected one by rash (49.6%), and proctitis occurred in 6.2% of patients. Six patients required hospitalization, of which one died due to causes unrelated to monkeypox. Interpretation: The 2022 monkeypox outbreak in Mexico is mainly driven by middle-aged men who have sex with men, of which a large proportion are persons who live with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clinical features such as the high proportion of anogenital lesions suggest sexual contact is a pivotal transmission mechanism in this outbreak. Funding: This research was supported by grant A1-S-18342 from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Mexico (to S.I.V.-F.).

7.
Epilepsia ; 63(10): e144-e149, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35943891

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the development and emergency approval of an array of effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Given the relatively small number of patients included in vaccine trials, postapproval epidemiological surveillance is crucial to detect infrequent vaccine-related adverse events. We conducted a nationwide retrospective descriptive study evaluating the incidence of seizures among recipients of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Mexico from December 24, 2020 (date of administration of first doses nationwide) to October 29, 2021. Among 81 916 351 doses of any vaccine that were administered, we documented seizures in 53 patients, of which 31 (60%) were new onset seizures. The incidence rate of seizures per million doses was highest for mRNA-1273 (Moderna) with 2.73 per million, followed by BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) with 1.02 per million, and Ad5-nCoV (CanSino) with 1.01 per million. Thus, we found that seizures following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are exceedingly rare events.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Convulsiones/etiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunas/efectos adversos
8.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(8)2022 Aug 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36016185

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the high number of vaccines administered against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) worldwide, the information on the psychological/psychiatric adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with these newly developed vaccines remains scarce. OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of psychological/psychiatric symptoms among recipients of five different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and to explore the factors associated with their development reported in the nationwide Mexican registry of AEFI against SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Descriptive study of all the psychological/psychiatric symptoms, including anxiety, panic attacks, insomnia, and agitation reported to the Mexican Epidemiological Surveillance System from 21 December 2020 to 27 April 2021, among adult (≥18 years old) recipients of 7,812,845 doses of BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCov-19, rAd26-rAd5, Ad5-nCoV, or CoronaVac. The factors associated with their development are determined by multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 19,163 AEFI reports during the study period; amongst them, 191 (1%) patients had psychological/psychiatric symptoms (median age of 41 years, interquartile range of 32-54; 149 [78%] women) for an observed incidence of 2.44 cases per 100,000 administered doses (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-2.82), 72.8% of psychiatric AEFIs were reported among recipients of BNT162b2. The median time from vaccination to symptom onset was 35 min (interquartile range: 10-720). Overall, the most common psychological/psychiatric symptoms were anxiety in 129 (67.5%) patients, panic attacks in 30 (15.7%), insomnia in 25 (13%), and agitation in 11 (5.7%). After adjusting for the confounding factors, the odds for developing psychological/psychiatric symptoms were higher for those concurrently reporting syncope (odds ratio [OR]: 4.73, 95% CI: 1.68-13.33); palpitations (OR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.65-3.70), and dizziness (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.10-2.28). CONCLUSION: In our population, psychological/psychiatric symptoms were extremely infrequent AEFIs. No severe psychiatric AEFIs were reported. Immunization stress-related responses might explain most of the detected cases.

9.
Lancet Reg Health Am ; 13: 100303, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35782204

RESUMEN

Background: The death toll after SARS-CoV-2 emergence includes deaths directly or indirectly associated with COVID-19. Mexico reported 325,415 excess deaths, 34.4% of them not directly related to COVID-19 in 2020. In this work, we aimed to analyse temporal changes in the distribution of the leading causes of mortality produced by COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico to understand excess mortality not directly related to the virus infection. Methods: We did a longitudinal retrospective study of the leading causes of mortality and their variation with respect to cause-specific expected deaths in Mexico from January 2020 through December 2021 using death certificate information. We fitted a Poisson regression model to predict cause-specific mortality during the pandemic period, based on the 2015-2019 registered mortality. We estimated excess deaths as a weekly difference between expected and observed deaths and added up for the entire period. We expressed all-cause and cause-specific excess mortality as a percentage change with respect to predicted deaths by our model. Findings: COVID-19 was the leading cause of death in 2020-2021 (439,582 deaths). All-cause total excess mortality was 600,590 deaths (38⋅2% [95% CI: 36·0 to 40·4] over expected). The largest increases in cause-specific mortality, occurred in diabetes (36·8% over expected), respiratory infections (33·3%), ischaemic heart diseases (32·5%) and hypertensive diseases (25·0%). The cause-groups that experienced significant decreases with respect to the expected pre-pandemic mortality were infectious and parasitic diseases (-20·8%), skin diseases (-17·5%), non-traffic related accidents (-16·7%) and malignant neoplasm (-5·3%). Interpretation: Mortality from COVID-19 became the first cause of death in 2020-2021, the increase in other causes of death may be explained by changes in the health service utilization patterns caused by hospital conversion or fear of the population using them. Cause-misclassification cannot be ruled out. Funding: This study was funded by Conacyt.

10.
Eur J Neurol ; 29(11): 3368-3379, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35841212

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Information on Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) against SARS-CoV-2 remains scarce. We aimed to report GBS incidence as an AEFI among adult (≥18 years) recipients of 81,842,426 doses of seven anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines between December 24, 2020, and October 29, 2021, in Mexico. METHODS: Cases were retrospectively collected through passive epidemiological surveillance. The overall observed incidence was calculated according to the total number of administered doses. Vaccines were analyzed individually and by vector as mRNA-based (mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2), adenovirus-vectored (ChAdOx1 nCov-19, rAd26-rAd5, Ad5-nCoV, and Ad26.COV2-S), and inactivated whole-virion-vectored (CoronaVac) vaccines. RESULTS: We identified 97 patients (52 males [53.6%]; median [interquartile range] age 44 [33-60] years), for an overall observed incidence of 1.19/1,000,000 doses (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.45), with incidence higher among Ad26.COV2-S (3.86/1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 1.50-9.93) and BNT162b2 recipients (1.92/1,00,000 doses, 95% CI 1.36-2.71). The interval (interquartile range) from vaccination to GBS symptom onset was 10 (3-17) days. Preceding diarrhea was reported in 21 patients (21.6%) and mild COVID-19 in four more (4.1%). Only 18 patients were tested for Campylobacter jejuni (positive in 16 [88.9%]). Electrophysiological examinations were performed in 76 patients (78.4%; axonal in 46 [60.5%] and demyelinating in 25 [32.8%]); variants were similar across the platforms. On admission, 91.8% had a GBS disability score ≥3. Seventy-five patients (77.3%) received intravenous immunoglobulin, received seven plasma exchange (7.2%), and 15 (15.5%) were treated conservatively. Ten patients (10.3%) died, and 79.1% of survivors were unable to walk independently. CONCLUSIONS: Guillain-Barré syndrome was an extremely infrequent AEFI against SARS-CoV-2. The protection provided by these vaccines outweighs the risk of developing GBS.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/efectos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/inducido químicamente , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad
11.
Neurology ; 98(19): e1933-e1941, 2022 05 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35277439

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Information on stroke among severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines remains scarce. We report stroke incidence as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) among recipients of 79,399,446 doses of 6 different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCov-19, Gam-COVID-Vac, CoronaVac, Ad5-nCoV, and Ad26.COV2-S) between December 24, 2020, and August 31, 2021, in Mexico. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study analyzed stroke incidence per million doses among hospitalized adult patients (≥18 years) during an 8-month interval. According to the World Health Organization, AEFIs were defined as clinical events occurring within 30 days after immunization and categorized as either nonserious or serious, depending on severity, treatment, and hospital admission requirements. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) cases were collected through a passive epidemiologic surveillance system in which local health providers report potential AEFI to the Mexican General Board of Epidemiology. Data were captured with standardized case report formats by an ad hoc committee appointed by the Mexican Ministry of Health to evaluate potential neurologic AEFI against SARS-COV-2. RESULTS: We included 56 patients (31 female patients [55.5%]) for an overall incidence of 0.71 cases per 1,000,000 administered doses (95% CI 0.54-0.92). Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55-76 years); median time from vaccination to stroke (of any subtype) was 2 days (IQR 1-5 days). In 27 (48.2%) patients, the event was diagnosed within the first 24 hours after immunization. The most frequent subtype was AIS in 43 patients (75%; 0.54 per 1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 0.40-0.73), followed by ICH in 9 (16.1%; 0.11 per 1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 0.06-0.22) and SAH and CVT, each with 2 cases (3.6%; 0.03 per 1,000,000 doses, 95% CI 0.01-0.09). Overall, the most common risk factors were hypertension in 33 (58.9%) patients and diabetes in 22 (39.3%). Median hospital length of stay was 6 days (IQR 4-13 days). At discharge, functional outcome was good (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) in 41.1% of patients; in-hospital mortality rate was 21.4%. DISCUSSION: Stroke is an exceedingly rare AEFI against SARS-CoV-2. Preexisting stroke risk factors were identified in most patients. Further research is needed to evaluate causal associations between SARS-COV-2 vaccines and stroke.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Anciano , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversos
13.
Vaccine ; 39(48): 6975-6979, 2021 11 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34742595

RESUMEN

mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are effective; however, persistent vaccine hesitancy is partly due to a misperception of their potential adverse events. Non-specific sensory symptoms (NSSS) following immunization are thought to be mediated by stress-related responses. In this case-control study, we evaluated NSSS from a cohort of 7,812,845 BNT162b2 first-dose recipients, of whom 10,929 reported an adverse event following immunization (AEFI). We found an overall frequency of 3.4% (377 cases) or 4.8 cases per 100,000 doses administered. Anatomically, the arms (61%) and face/neck region (36.2%) were the most commonly affected sites. The control group had significantly higher rates of reactogenicity-associated symptoms, suggesting that NSSS are reactogenicity-independent; in multivariable analysis, healthcare workers reported sensory symptoms less frequently (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.40-0.72;p < 0.001). This is the first study describing the topography and associated factors for developing NSSS among BNT162b2 recipients. The benign nature of these symptoms may help dissipate hesitation towards this vaccine.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , ARN Mensajero , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas/efectos adversos
14.
Clin Immunol ; 229: 108786, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34147649

RESUMEN

mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are remarkably effective. Limited information exists about the incidence of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with their use. We conducted a prospective observational study including data from 704,003 first-doses recipients; 6536 AEFI were reported, of whom 65.1% had at least one neurologic AEFI (non-serious 99.6%). Thirty-three serious events were reported; 17 (51.5%) were neurologic (observed frequency, 2.4/100,000 doses). At the time of writing this report, 16/17 cases had been discharged without deaths. Our data suggest that the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is safe; its individual and societal benefits outweigh the low percentage of serious neurologic AEFI. This information should help to dissipate hesitancy towards this new vaccine platform.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Vacunas de ARNm
15.
Lancet Planet Health ; 5(5): e277-e285, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33964237

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effective Aedes aegypti control is limited, in part, by the difficulty in achieving sufficient intervention coverage. To maximise the effect of vector control, areas with persistently high numbers of Aedes-borne disease cases could be identified and prioritised for preventive interventions. We aimed to identify persistent Aedes-borne disease hotspots in cities across southern Mexico. METHODS: In this spatial analysis, geocoded cases of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika from nine endemic Mexican cities were aggregated at the census-tract level. We included cities that were located in southern Mexico (the arbovirus endemic region of Mexico), with a high burden of dengue cases (ie, more than 5000 cases reported during a 10-year period), and listed as high priority for the Mexican dengue control and prevention programme. The Getis-Ord Gi*(d) statistic was applied to yearly slices of the dataset to identify spatial hotspots of each disease in each city. We used Kendall's W coefficient to quantify the agreement in the distribution of each virus. FINDINGS: 128 507 dengue, 4752 chikungunya and 25 755 Zika clinical cases were reported between Jan 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2016. All cities showed evidence of transmission heterogeneity, with a mean of 17·6% (SD 4·7) of their total area identified as persistent disease hotspots. Hotspots accounted for 25·6% (SD 9·7; range 12·8-43·0) of the population and 32·1% (10·5; 19·6-50·5) of all Aedes-borne disease cases reported. We found an overlap between hotspots of 61·7% for dengue and Zika and 53·3% for dengue and chikungunya. Dengue hotspots in 2008-16 were significantly associated with dengue hotspots detected during 2017-20 in five of the nine cities. Heads of vector control confirmed hotspot areas as problem zones for arbovirus transmission. INTERPRETATION: This study provides evidence of the overlap of Aedes-borne diseases within geographical hotspots and a methodological framework for the stratification of arbovirus transmission risk within urban areas, which can guide the implementation of surveillance and vector control. FUNDING: USAID, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, International Development Research Centre, Fondo Mixto CONACyT (Mexico)-Gobierno del Estado de Yucatan, and the US National Institutes of Health. TRANSLATION: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre Chikungunya , Dengue , Infección por el Virus Zika , Virus Zika , Canadá , Fiebre Chikungunya/epidemiología , Dengue/epidemiología , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Mosquitos Vectores , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis Espacial , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología
16.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 28(10): 1826-1832, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32610364

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study's aim was to explore the association of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on admission. METHODS: In the present study, a total of 23,593 patient samples were evaluated by a laboratory from the Mexican Institute of Epidemiological Diagnosis and Reference. Of these, 18,443 were negative for COVID-19, 3,844 were positive for COVID-19, and 1,306 were positive for other respiratory viruses. Severe types of respiratory disease were defined by the presence of pneumonia and other organ failure that requires intensive care. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore factors associated with severe COVID-19 on admission. RESULTS: Patients who tested positive for COVID-19 had a higher proportion of obesity (17.4%), diabetes (14.5%), and hypertension (18.9%) compared with those without a confirmed diagnosis. Compared with patients without obesity, those with obesity showed a 1.43-fold higher odds of developing severe COVID-19 on admission, whereas subjects with diabetes and hypertension showed a 1.87-fold and 1.77-fold higher odds of developing severe COVID-19 on admission, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, diabetes, and hypertension were significantly associated with severe COVID-19 on admission and the association of obesity was stronger in patients < 50 years of age.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/virología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/virología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
17.
Arch Virol ; 165(9): 2095-2098, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32556599

RESUMEN

SARS-CoV-2 was first detected in the city of Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. In this report, we describe the complete genome sequence of the first imported SARS-CoV-2, detected in a Mexican patient who had traveled to Bergamo, Italy. Phylogenetic analysis showed that this isolate belongs to subclade A2a (lineage G) and is closely related to isolates from Finland, Germany and Brazil, all of which were from patients with a history of travel to Italy. This is the first report of the complete genome sequence of this virus in Mexico.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/genética , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Genoma Viral , Neumonía Viral/virología , Adulto , Secuencia de Bases , Betacoronavirus/clasificación , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Humanos , Masculino , México , Pandemias , Filogenia , SARS-CoV-2 , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma
18.
J Infect Public Health ; 13(4): 509-513, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31813835

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence should be calculated in cross-sectional studies using recent infection testing algorithms (RITA) that consider clinical variables and serological test results such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and dried blood spot (DBS) analysis. METHODS: The correlation between serum samples and DBS was evaluated using two commercial ELISA kits: SediaTM BED HIV-1 Incidence EIA (BED-Sedia) and Maxim HIV-1 Limiting Antigen Avidity (LAg-Avidity). Eight different RITAs were developed; all of them included serological assays. A combination of the variables viral load, antiretroviral therapy (ART) and CD4 count was used to build the RITAs. The sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, predictive positive value, predictive negative value, false recent rate (FRR) and false long-term rate were evaluated. RESULTS: The correlations between serum samples and DBS were 0.990 and 0.867 for BED-Sedia and LAg-avidity, respectively. Using only serological assays, the Youden index was higher for LAg-avidity than BED-Sedia (82.1-83.0% versus 69.2-69.6%). The best RITA was ART-serology, which showed a Youden index of 91.2-93.9% and FRR of 1.8-2.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Using DBS samples to determine HIV incidence is a good tool for epidemiological surveillance. The RITA that included ART and serological tests (BED-Sedia or LAg-avidity) showed the highest sensitivity and specificity and a low FRR.


Asunto(s)
Serodiagnóstico del SIDA , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Homosexualidad Masculina/estadística & datos numéricos , Serodiagnóstico del SIDA/métodos , Serodiagnóstico del SIDA/estadística & datos numéricos , Algoritmos , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Pruebas con Sangre Seca , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Carga Viral
19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 1081, 2019 Dec 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31878895

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The European Commission (EC) Horizon 2020 (H2020)-funded ZIKAlliance Consortium designed a multicentre study including pregnant women (PW), children (CH) and natural history (NH) cohorts. Clinical sites were selected over a wide geographic range within Latin America and the Caribbean, taking into account the dynamic course of the ZIKV epidemic. METHODS: Recruitment to the PW cohort will take place in antenatal care clinics. PW will be enrolled regardless of symptoms and followed over the course of pregnancy, approximately every 4 weeks. PW will be revisited at delivery (or after miscarriage/abortion) to assess birth outcomes, including microcephaly and other congenital abnormalities according to the evolving definition of congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). After birth, children will be followed for 2 years in the CH cohort. Follow-up visits are scheduled at ages 1-3, 4-6, 12, and 24 months to assess neurocognitive and developmental milestones. In addition, a NH cohort for the characterization of symptomatic rash/fever illness was designed, including follow-up to capture persisting health problems. Blood, urine, and other biological materials will be collected, and tested for ZIKV and other relevant arboviral diseases (dengue, chikungunya, yellow fever) using RT-PCR or serological methods. A virtual, decentralized biobank will be created. Reciprocal clinical monitoring has been established between partner sites. Substudies of ZIKV seroprevalence, transmission clustering, disabilities and health economics, viral kinetics, the potential role of antibody enhancement, and co-infections will be linked to the cohort studies. DISCUSSION: Results of these large cohort studies will provide better risk estimates for birth defects and other developmental abnormalities associated with ZIKV infection including possible co-factors for the variability of risk estimates between other countries and regions. Additional outcomes include incidence and transmission estimates of ZIKV during and after pregnancy, characterization of short and long-term clinical course following infection and viral kinetics of ZIKV. STUDY REGISTRATIONS: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03188731 (PW cohort), June 15, 2017; clinicaltrials.gov NCT03393286 (CH cohort), January 8, 2018; clinicaltrials.gov NCT03204409 (NH cohort), July 2, 2017.


Asunto(s)
Arbovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Microcefalia/complicaciones , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Virus Zika/inmunología , Adulto , Arbovirus/genética , Región del Caribe/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Coinfección , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , América Latina/epidemiología , Microcefalia/epidemiología , Microcefalia/virología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Atención Prenatal , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Virus Zika/aislamiento & purificación , Infección por el Virus Zika/transmisión , Infección por el Virus Zika/virología
20.
Gac Med Mex ; 155(5): 464-472, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31695231

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Congenital syphilis continues to be a public health problem in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: To assess the similarities and differences between national standards, guidelines and international documents related to the detection of syphilis in pregnant women and congenital syphilis. METHOD: Two algorithms were developed based on the standard of female care during pregnancy and on the standard for prevention and control of sexually transmitted infections. Based on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, algorithms were developed for syphilis during pregnancy, syphilis in the newborn and sexual contacts. RESULTS: The standard for pregnancy mentions that syphilis testing should be carried out in every pregnant woman on her first contact or at delivery, without diagnostic tests being specified. The Official Mexican Standard (NOM) on sexually transmitted infections mentions the traditional algorithm for syphilis detection, treatment follow-up, coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus and congenital syphilis criteria. The CDC recommend reverse algorithm, antibody titer, treatment and follow-up as part of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The elimination of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis requires NOMs updating and homogenizing, as well as the study of stillbirths and neonates born to mothers with syphilis.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La sífilis congénita continúa siendo un problema de salud pública en México. OBJETIVO: Evaluar las similitudes y diferencias entre normas nacionales, guías y documentos internacionales relacionados con la detección de sífilis en embarazadas y sífilis congénita. MÉTODO: Se elaboraron dos algoritmos basados en las normas sobre atención de la mujer durante el embarazo y sobre prevención y control de infecciones de transmisión sexual. A partir de la guía de Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) se realizaron algoritmos sobre sífilis durante el embarazo, sífilis en recién nacido y contactos sexuales. RESULTADOS: La norma sobre embarazo menciona que la prueba de sífilis debe efectuarse a toda mujer embarazada en su primer contacto o durante el parto, sin especificar pruebas diagnósticas. La norma oficial mexicana (NOM) sobre infecciones de transmisión sexual menciona el algoritmo tradicional para detección de sífilis, seguimiento al tratamiento, coinfección con virus de inmunodeficiencia humana y criterios de sífilis congénita. CDC recomienda algoritmo reverso, título de anticuerpos, tratamiento y seguimiento como parte del diagnóstico. CONCLUSIONES: La eliminación de la transmisión maternoinfantil de sífilis requiere actualizar y homogeneizar las NOM, así como el estudio de mortinatos y de recién nacidos de madres con sífilis.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Serodiagnóstico de la Sífilis , Sífilis Congénita/diagnóstico , Femenino , Regulación Gubernamental , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , México , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Sífilis Congénita/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...